{"id":12242,"date":"2012-02-07T02:02:59","date_gmt":"2012-02-07T02:02:59","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2012-02-28T17:02:38","modified_gmt":"2012-02-28T17:02:38","slug":"The-End-of-Wall-Street-as-we-knew-it-","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/asiancemagazine.com\/?p=12242","title":{"rendered":"The End of Wall Street as we knew it?"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is so crazy but it’s definitely true. Many of my friends who are still in banking are not pleased with their salaries and bonuses. They are thinking of getting out of the industry for good!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Great article in New York Magazine titled The End of Wall Street As They Knew It<\/a>.<\/p>\n

After surprisingly successful financial reform, public vilification, and politics that have turned against them, the Masters of the Universe are masters no longer.<\/strong><\/p>\n

On Wall Street, bonus season is a sacred ritual. It is the annual rite where net worth and self-worth get elegantly reduced to a single number. During the 25-year boom that abruptly ended in 2008, the only principle that really mattered come bonus time was how you ranked against the guys to your right and left. The system was governed by a kind of atavistic justice: You eat what you kill. From the outside, the seven- and eight-figure payouts that star bankers earned could seem obscene, immoral even. But on the inside, the outlandish compensation reflected a strict, almost moral logic. \u201cWall Street is a meritocracy, for the most part,\u201d as a senior Citigroup executive put it to me recently. \u201cIf someone has a bonus, it\u2019s because they created value for their institution.\u201d The sanctity of the bonus was built on the idea that Wall Street pay was simply the natural order of capitalism.<\/p>\n

And so, among the many dislocations Wall Street has suffered since 2008, none may have been more destabilizing than the headlines that flashed across Bloomberg terminals on the afternoon of January 17, when news leaked that Morgan Stanley would cap cash bonuses at just $125,000. A week later, Bank of America announced that it would be cutting the cash portion of its bonuses by 75 percent, giving the rest in stock. All across Wall Street, compensation is crashing. Goldman Sachs, coming off a lackluster fourth quarter, slashed compensation by 21 percent.<\/p>\n

Banks have always had occasional bad years, but the sense on Wall Street is that this bad year is different. Over the past several weeks, I have had wide-ranging conversations with more than two dozen senior Wall Street executives, traders, bankers, hedge-fund managers, and private-equity investors. And what emerged is a picture of an industry afflicted by a crisis it would not be flip to call existential.<\/p>\n

The crash four years ago was shocking enough to the financial class. But what is happening on Wall Street now is even more terrifying. No doubt the economy itself\u2014the crisis in Europe, the effects of the tsunami in Japan, America\u2019s sputtering recovery\u2014has played a large part in the financial industry\u2019s struggles. But even the most stubborn economies improve eventually. The bigger issues are structural. The Dodd-Frank financial-\u00adreform act, much maligned, has already begun to change the shape of the financial system\u2014even before a number of its major provisions are proposed to go into full effect this coming July. Banks are working hard to interpret Dodd-Frank\u2019s provisions in a way most favorable to them\u2014and repealing Dodd-Frank is a key piece of Mitt Romney\u2019s campaign platform. <\/p>\n

Continue reading the rest of the article at NYMag.com<\/a><\/p>\n

Reminds me of one of my favorite movies, American Psycho!<\/p>\n